Present:
- Kathryn Aldous (KA)
- Jane Apperley (JA)
- Mark Cook (MC)
- Mark Lowdell (ML)
- Don Milligan (DM)
- Derwood Pamphilon (DP)
- Diana Samson (DS)
- Mike Scott (MS)
- Keith Smith (KS)
- Nina Som (NS)
Apologies:
- Jenny Byrne
- Jackie Cornish
- Rafael Duarte
- Mike Potter
- Sarah Raymond
- Jeremy Whelan
| 1. |
Minutes of previous meeting
These were accepted. |
|
| 2. |
Matters Arising
All important actions were completed. It was agreed to update the list of members of the TAC on the Terms of Reference and also the frequency of meetings to twice yearly. |
Action: DP |
| 3. |
Report from the Quality Forum (KA)
The group meets bimonthly. There are roughly 15 attendees at each meeting. The Minutes of meetings are posted on the BSBMT website. Topics discussed include JACIE standards, check lists and preparation for inspection. There has been positive feedback from meetings so far. The group is exploring the possibility of running a 1-2 day Quality Workshop soon. An article written by KA and NS is to be submitted to the EBMT newsletter. It was agreed to put more SOPs on the BSBMT website. NS indicated that the Bristol Transplant Programme SOPs could be accessed via Avonweb NHSnet [NHSNet connection required], and login details should be obtained from her. |
Actions: NS/KA |
| 4. |
Outcome of UK inspections in 2004
DS reported on 5 inspections that took place in 2004:- One centre is accredited. One has met all the requirements but is awaiting EFI inspection. In the other 3 centres there are ongoing document revisions. All are expected to achieve Level 1 status in the near future. |
|
| 5. |
UK inspections planned 2005/06
So far there are applications from Cambridge, Sheffield Children's Hospital, National Blood Service and Hammersmith Hospitals. A number of other centres have expressed an interest in application in 2005/06. It was agreed that it is important to understand the requirements and accreditation schedule of each centre so that inspections could be sensibly scheduled on a 3-year rolling cycle. |
Action: DP |
| 6. |
Proposal for workshop on regulatory affairs
DP tabled a suggestion for a workshop to be held in Feb 2006. This was agreed and DP said that a detailed proposal would be circulated soon. |
Action: DP |
| 7. |
Report from JACIE Board/Executive
DS presented a detailed report which is attached to these Minutes. (Appendix 1). |
|
| 8. |
Web-site
This now contains up to date information and will be kept updated 3 monthly. |
Action: DP |
| 9. |
EFI accreditation
There is a requirement that all centres carrying out allogeneic BMT should have full EFI accreditation before they can achieve level 1 JACIE status. JACIE request that applications for EFI accreditation should have been submitted by the time of application/inspection for JACIE. For centres that have already been inspected without having applied for EFI, and are subsequently found to be fully compliant in all other respects, the position is that the centre cannot be accredited but the Board will write formally to state that the centre is fully compliant with the exception of EFI, and that JACIE accreditation will granted directly on receipt of EFI accreditation provided this is obtained within 12 months of the date of the JACIE Medical Director's final letter. A survey conducted by DP showed that most respondents did not anticipate problems. There were significant constraints in 2 centres. It was agreed that a further survey targeted specifically to allo-transplant centres with follow-up to non-respondents should be conducted. It was also felt appropriate to make further enquiries as to how other European centres would comply with the requirement for EFI. It was agreed that in the mean time centres should not be discouraged from applying for JACIE accreditation - EFI accreditation would be discussed with them on an individual basis. DP would write formally to JACIE after the further survey had been done. |
Action: DP |
| 10. |
Financial report
The funding requirements in 2005/2006 are for 2 x TAC meetings and support for the venues at which Quality Forum meetings are held. The expected funding requirement is less than £10k. |
|
| 11. |
Directives and guidelines
There are now a large number of documents that are relevant to BMT. These are:-
It was agreed that taking note of and implementing all the requirements of these documents presented a considerable challenge. During discussion it emerged that there was a lack of clarity on:
|
Action: DP |
| 12. |
Any Other Business
|
Action: ML |
| 13. |
Date of Next Meeting
Next meeting will be on Friday 25th November 2005, 10am at the Novartis Foundation. |